pay placements judged unlawful
Three judges ruled that the
oakleys sunglasses regulations under which most of the schemes were created are unlawful and quashed them.
The Government expressed "disappointment and surprise" at the decision and said it now intends to push through new regulations to ensure future schemes are lawfully based. Moves to appeal to the Supreme Court against the ruling are
fake cheap oakleys also under consideration.
The court ruled that the Government had acted unlawfully in requiring university graduate Cait Reilly to work for free at a Poundland discount store under a flagship back to work scheme.
Miss Reilly, 24, from Birmingham, and 40 year old unemployed HGV driver Jamieson Wilson, from Nottingham, both succeeded in their claims that the unpaid schemes they were
oakley sunglasses replica required to participate in were legally flawed.
Their solicitors said later that the ruling means "all those people who have been sanctioned by having their jobseeker’s allowance withdrawn for non compliance with the back to work schemes affected will be entitled to reclaim their benefits".
Public Interest Lawyers said: "The result is that over the past two years the Government has unlawfully required tens of thousands of unemployed people to work without pay and unlawfully stripped thousands more of their subsistence benefits."
Employment minister Mark Hoban said he was disappointed and surprised at the court’s decision on the regulations.
But he said the judges’ ruling had upheld
cheap oakleys the Government’s right to run back to work schemes.
Mr Hoban said: "The court has backed our right to require people to take part in programmes
cheap fake oakleys which will help get them into work. It’s ridiculous to say this is forced labour. This ruling ensures we can continue with these important schemes.
"There needed to be flexibility so we could
replica oakleys give people the right support to meet their needs and get them into a job. We do not agree with the court’s judgment and are seeking permission to appeal, but new regulations will be tabled to avoid any uncertainty.
"Ultimately the judgment confirms that it is right that we expect people to take getting into work seriously if they want to claim benefits."
Mr Hoban said the Government would be pushing through emergency regulations to enable the scheme to continue.
"What the judge said is that there should be more detail in the regulations. What we are doing today is introducing emergency regulations to provide that detail," he told BBC Radio 4′s The World At One.
"So it’s business as usual for people who want support to look for a job. At the same time we are going to appeal this judgment."
For Labour, shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne said: "It beggars belief that David Cameron’s Government is now so incompetent it can’t even organise work experience.
"Work experience is crucial in helping many young people get ready for work. Two years in, David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith’s so called welfare revolution is in a state of advanced chaos."
Matthew Oakley, head of economics and social policy at Policy Exchange, said: "Let’s be clear. This is not a ruling against back to work schemes and should not be seen as some sort of body blow to the Government’s welfare plans.
"The main problem in this particular instance was miscommunication of the requirements and penalties for not complying, rather than the policy itself.
"Ultimately, the Government’s approach is the right one. Giving young people the experience they need to enter the world of work is exactly the right thing to do and we should not allow people with no previous experience and who are claiming benefits the opportunity to pick and choose the sorts of jobs they go for.
"It is also right that more support is given to people who have spent extremely long periods in some cases over three years unemployed.
"With such long periods out of work it is essential they are helped to find placements where they can get the experience they need to re enter work.
"The vocal lobbying against these programmes is damaging the chances of these groups finding employment."
Today’s ruling was made unanimously by Lord Justice Pill, Lady Justice Black and Sir Stanley Burnton.
In November 2011, Miss Reilly had to
wholesale cheap oakley sunglasses leave her voluntary work at a local
cheap fake oakley sunglasses museum and work unpaid at the Poundland store in Kings Heath, Birmingham, under a scheme known as the "sector based work academy".
She was told that if she did not carry out the work placement she would lose her jobseeker’s allowance.
For two weeks she stacked shelves and cleaned floors.
Mr Wilson, a qualified mechanic, was told that he had to work unpaid, cleaning furniture for 30 hours a week for six months, under a scheme known as the Community Action Programme.
He objected to doing unpaid work that was unrelated to his qualifications and would not help him re enter the jobs market.Articles Connexes：
- http://www.britmovie.co.uk/
- http://www.skinnymom.com/
- http://www.fundacionsasm.org/cheap-oakleys-fake-oakley-sunglasses-9541/
- http://thestewartgroup.ca/wholesale-oakleys-oakleys-sunglasses-8104/
- http://www.hernaldozuniga.com/cheap-oakleys-fake-oakley-wholesale-9543/
- http://www.edgepublicsolutions.co.uk/fake-cheap-oakleys-wholesale-oakleys-6293/
- http://participasevilla.sevilla.org/?p=11712
- http://www.stephenfry.com/
Articles Connexes：
- http://www.speedhunters.com/
- http://www.coursehero.com/blog/2015/06/22/cheap-oakleys-fake-cheap-oakleys-7566/
- http://samuraika.kz/?p=158
- http://cdl.tv/blog/
- http://www.tribecasquare.asia/
- http://cangual.net/ca/cheap-wholesale-oakleys-cheap-fake-oakley-sunglasses-7902/
- http://www.orapub.cn/posts/5242.html
- http://www.danpyne.co.uk/
- http://www.alexandercollege.ca/
- http://library2.binghamton.edu/news/blog/2015/06/22/fake-oakleys-cheap-cheap-oakleys-6949/